Huntington Beach man gets 6 years for church arson – Sacramento News – Local and Breaking Sacramento News | Sacramento Bee

August 20, 2011

http://www.sacbee.com/2011/08/19/3848918/huntington-beach-man-gets-6-years.html


Doctor pleads guilty to 40 felony counts of fraud The Orange County Register

August 7, 2011

http://m.ocregister.com/news/patients-310972-guilty-pleaded.html


Donations PLEASE HELP

August 3, 2011


Man returned to Hawaii to face ID theft charges – San Jose Mercury News

August 2, 2011

http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_18590673 

***** Ya know, I’ve been inside  a Hawiian State Prison in a PROFESSIONAL capacity…. They a bit my rough than California State Peisons! Id hate to be that guy!!!!!   😉


Reputed mob boss appeals Florida fraud sentence – WSJ.com

July 30, 2011

http://online.wsj.com/article/APbd26bb3037d64ccba252b1df34de1777.html  Shared via Dolphin Browser


Drug Crime Defense: The Myth of the Infallible Drug Sniffing Dog

July 30, 2011

Defending people against the massive assault by the Federal Government called the War on Drugs in drug possession, drug trafficking, possession with intent to distribute, and conspiracy to distribute or manufacture controlled substances cases calls on us to fulfil our duty as dedicated defense attorneys to ensure the government has abided by the Constitution in the area of search and seizure, including canine “alerts” or dog sniff cases.

United States Supreme Court Justice Souter’s dissenting opinion in Illinois v. Caballes sums up our attitude regarding narcotic cases where probable cause or reasonable suspicion is based on a positive canine alert.

“At the heart both of Place and the Court’s opinion today is the proposition that sniffs by a trained dog are sui generis because a reaction by the dog in going alert is a response to nothing but the presence of contraband.

Hence, the argument goes, because the sniff can only reveal the presence of items devoid of any legal use, the sniff “does not implicate legitimate privacy interests” and is not to be treated as a search.

The infallible dog, however, is a creature of legal fiction. Although the Supreme Court of Illinois did not get into the sniffing averages of drug dogs, their supposed infallibility is belied by judicial opinions describing well-trained animals sniffing and alerting with less than perfect accuracy, whether owing to errors by their handlers, the limitations of the dogs themselves, or even the pervasive contamination of currency by cocaine. … Indeed, a study cited by Illinois in this case for the proposition that dog sniffs are “generally reliable” shows that dogs in artificial testing situations return false positives anywhere from 12.55 to 60% of the time, depending on the length of the search. … In practical terms, the evidence is clear that the dog that alerts hundreds of times will be wrong dozens of times.”

Our dedicated defense attorneys defend all drug crimes at the Federal and State level including:

MDMA (ecstasy), Rohypnol, GHB Selling prescription pills (Xanax) Cocaine and crack cocaine Conspiracy Drug cultivation and manufacturing Drug trafficking, transportation, and distribution Heroin possession and sales Marijuana possession and sales Methamphetamine manufacturing and sales Possession of chemicals for drug manufacturing Possession with intent to deliver and drugs sales False or forged prescriptions Police sting operations.


3 Major Ways A Criminal Defense Lawyer Can Help You

July 27, 2011

http://m.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/3-major-ways-a-criminal-defense-lawyer-can-help-you-5056431.html  Shared via Dolphin Browser